OPINION:(This opinion was initially published by the author on his facebook page)
The National Intelligence Service could soon have complete access to your mobile phone messages and emails if a Bill proposing the removal of a requirement mandating them to first get court warrants before accessing any citizen's private messages sails through National Assembly.
The Bill proposes the deletion of section 36 (2) of the current act, on limitation to right to privacy as enshrined in Article 31 of the Constitution, that provides for the court's participation.
The court process was to mitigate between the need for the protection
of citizens' privacy while at the same time allowing government agents
monitor the activities of those that they suspect of criminal
involvement in activities such as terrorism, money laundering, drug
trafficking and corruption.
Before gaining access to a citizen's private communication data, it was upon the spy agency to convince the courts why it was important to have the rights to privacy removed. This may not be the case soon, if the government gets its way in National Assembly.
The section targeted for amendment provides that, "the right to privacy may be limited in respect of a person suspected to have committed an offence to the extent that the privacy of a person's communications may be investigated, monitored or otherwise interfered with".
Section 42 as currently written gives NIS powers to browse your mails only after obtaining court warrant. The spy agency therefore needed to apply for the document from the High Court, in writing stating among others the type of information, material, record, document or thing proposed to be obtained.
If parliament approves the amendments, the government spies will now have powers to listen in on your phone conversations and intercept your mails without the Judiciary exercising any control.
The Bill further seeks to amend Section 36 (1) of the Act to give the spies power to infringe on the privacy of any person who is subject to investigations. Under the same Act, NIS can only monitor, listen or intercept communication of any person deemed to have committed an offence.
The right to privacy set out in Article 31 of the Constitution which states that every person has the right to privacy, which includes the right not to have their person, home or property searched; their possessions seized; information relating to their family or private affairs unnecessarily required or revealed; or the privacy of their communications infringed.
Before gaining access to a citizen's private communication data, it was upon the spy agency to convince the courts why it was important to have the rights to privacy removed. This may not be the case soon, if the government gets its way in National Assembly.
The section targeted for amendment provides that, "the right to privacy may be limited in respect of a person suspected to have committed an offence to the extent that the privacy of a person's communications may be investigated, monitored or otherwise interfered with".
Section 42 as currently written gives NIS powers to browse your mails only after obtaining court warrant. The spy agency therefore needed to apply for the document from the High Court, in writing stating among others the type of information, material, record, document or thing proposed to be obtained.
If parliament approves the amendments, the government spies will now have powers to listen in on your phone conversations and intercept your mails without the Judiciary exercising any control.
The Bill further seeks to amend Section 36 (1) of the Act to give the spies power to infringe on the privacy of any person who is subject to investigations. Under the same Act, NIS can only monitor, listen or intercept communication of any person deemed to have committed an offence.
The right to privacy set out in Article 31 of the Constitution which states that every person has the right to privacy, which includes the right not to have their person, home or property searched; their possessions seized; information relating to their family or private affairs unnecessarily required or revealed; or the privacy of their communications infringed.